Consider the judge and the stuff he / she should be kept responsible for, and you’ll understand what’s going on in determining the bail quantities. Think of judges as ordinary human beings with the same desires, interests, and wishes as the rest of us, but with a twist-they are expected to provide the very bad guys with such items.Click here to read more
Bail is one of the things.
Let’s think about bail as per felony offences.
Why is the Judge needed to set bail (mostly)?
And this is the Charter. The 8th Amendment of the US Constitution states, “Excessive bail shall not be needed….” It does not imply that the right of bail only remains in any situations, only because it is not to be “excessive” by all who have Bail provided by them. Furthermore, as a practical matter, most persons convicted of violent crime get any form of bail.
Bail is a loan an convict promises to compensate in case he/she refuses to perform something the Court wants. If, for example, the Court has required the accused to report to the Court at the next trial, imposing bail would enhance the importance and responsibility in the accused’s mind in compliance with the Court’s order. Within the statutory limits of not being “excessive,” the amount of bail is entirely beyond the judge’s “discretion” (is solely the judge’s decision).
Yet guys hear the monitor. Many judges, such as judges at the Appeals Court, will have the right to examine the reasoning behind the setting of a bail sum by a judge and revoke the number, or give it back to the initial judge for reconsideration whether the Court of Appeal reasonably disagreed with the thought of the first judge. But judges set bails mostly by the sums and terms they assume other judges won’t argue with.
Citizens can still be waiting to register. Judges tend to be perceived as strict on crime and suspects, particularly when no verdict has yet been passed down and an individual is often presumed innocent. Judges will live by the presumption of innocence. Because if they value the belief too much, the voters would perceive the judge as “too soft on crime” and would perceive to it the in the next political cycle the judge will not be continued as a judge.