Criminal Defendants on Trial – Courtroom Demeanor

The word attitude is a term which is not used today as much as it was in years gone by. Each time we see a word that is not often used we can respond in one of two ways. We can ignore it unwisely, or we can try to grasp its purpose by applying it to our lives for our best results.Criminal justice attorney is an excellent resource for this.

When we look at the word up in the Dictionary, we see that demeanor is described as “outward behaviour; behaviour; deportation; and manner.” Why would demeanor in the courtroom affect the outcome of my case? Will my inner thoughts and convictions cause me to behave or act in a way that is hurtful to me? Is the way I think, look and behave causing others to treat me negatively? Will I want to win my case, really? Let’s focus about that.
At War with Police, Attorney General and Court?
Following years of questioning suspects facing serious criminal charges, one common thread that seems to run through these cases is that the victims frequently feel as though they are at war with the police. The policeman’s model as a friend turned to the policeman as an adversary at some stage in their lives. The police position never really changed. The task of police in 1840, 1920 and 2010 is the same: to stop the crime and to arrest suspects.

What changed was the view of the defendant’s police position.
The defendant followed lifestyle behaviour, which placed him in the spotlight as a perpetrator of whatever crime was identified and in the investigation process. He was on the wrong spot, at the wrong time with the wrong men.

During a court case, too, too many defendants believe they are at war with the prosecutor. We are told the State is taking the case against them personally. Accused are usually misguided in this respect, and have the wrong viewpoint. Their errant thought pits the State in some form of personal fight against itself. While this is very real inside the mind of the defendant, it has no sense in real life.

Defendants often believe that on a personal level Judges and Courts are at odds with them. Surely they have to be “out to get me.” These innermost emotions give most suspects a wrong outlook on the legal process and the criminal justice system. Despite professional counsel ‘s guidance, defendant usually start off on the wrong track when they begin to maneuver through the court process.The real role of the police, law enforcement and the Court

Police are currently under a legal obligation to arrest people if there is probable reason to suspect they may have committed a crime. Police are not permitted to turn a blind eye. They can not walk away from the accident and forget it. Coming under a legal obligation means police are not able to escape so they will apprehend the suspect. Police are expected to bring the suspect under control, to be brought to jail and booked for the charged offense.

The prosecutor’s job is to support the argument of the State through witness statements and real or tangible proof beyond reasonable doubt. Crimes are broken down into felony components. Every aspect has to be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Emphasis of the prosecutor is on fulfilling the burden of evidence of the Court.